Trump proudly visits new concentration camp



Official White House photo via Wikimedia Commons. Click here for high-resolution version.


I wonder: Is it because contemporary Republicans don’t know anything about the history of Nazi concentration camps that they are so eager for photo ops in front of cages, and that thus they just don’t understand how foolish it is to strut their depravity for the historical record? Or is it something like the opposite, that they are truly proud to be what they are?

They own it now. They own everything that ever happens in these places. The fools who voted for them own it, too.

Often it’s impossible to get public domain photos for current events. For Trump’s visit to “Alligator Alcatraz,” though, dozens of official White House photos were uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The Trump regime, clearly, wants the photos to be seen by as many people as possible.

I find that I just cannot comprehend how people like this think. And I’m afraid we’re going to learn much more about what this kind of people are capable of.


Official White House photo via Wikimedia Commons. Click here for high-resolution version.

Cucumbers … and sesame



Asian cucumber salad with salmon pâté

The local summer tomatoes aren’t here yet. The cucumbers, though, are tiding me over. For the past three weeks, I’ve gotten three pints of cucumbers each week from my local farmers, Brittany and Richard. They grow four types of cucumbers. I love them all.

If I were asked to make a short list of the loftiest flavors on the planet, I’d include toasted sesame. Sesame is an ancient crop with a history that goes back at least 3,000 years. (Barley, by comparison, was cultivated 9,000 years ago!) I always have raw sesame seeds in the fridge, and every time I think to use them I wonder why I don’t use them more often. They’re easy to toast, in a skillet. As for storebought toasted sesame oil, I use that almost every day.

I haven’t seen it in ages, but health food stores used to sell sesame salt. That’s a Japanese condiment (gomasio) made from toasted sesame seeds (ground) and salt. It’s easy to make your own. Toast the sesame seeds in a skillet, and grind them in a blender.

We usually disparage the post-agriculture diet as inferior to the hunter-gatherer diet. No doubt that’s true. But, these days, when international trade and international shipping are so easy, we can have post-agriculture foods from all over the world at low prices — foods from other climates, and thus a much greater variety of foods. Then again, a purely local diet can be healthy, too — as long as one has, or has access to, some really good fields, pastures, and gardens.

Ugly media failure on “the Big Beautiful Bill”



Elizabeth MacDonough, the Senate parliamentarian. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

The media have done an absolutely rotten job of saying what’s in Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill.” The stories will say something about the deficit, then revert to the usual he-said she-said political junk. It’s infuriating.

As is so often the case these days, we have to depend on refugees from the mainstream media to provide us with very basic information that the mainstream media ignores so that it can focus on the inane political yipyap that it loves so much.

Jennifer Rubin, who resigned from the Washington Post and is now a part of “the Contrarian” on Substack, provides a partial list this morning of items in the bill that the Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, said are in violation of the Byrd Rule.

You’d almost think that the media don’t want us to understand just how corrupt and repulsive Republicans really are. And, yeah, let’s talk about campus protests and trans teenagers instead — you know, those real threats to America.

Jennifer Rubin’s list:

• A provision selling off millions of acres of federal lands

• A provision to pass food aid costs on to states

• Proposed limitations on food aid benefits to certain citizens or lawful permanent residents

• Proposed restrictions on the ability of federal courts to issue nationwide injunctions and temporary restraining orders

• A proposal for a funding cap for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and for slashing pay of employees at the Federal Reserve

• A proposal to slash $293 million from the Treasury Department’s Office of Financial Research

• A plan to dissolve the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

• An effort to repeal an EPA rule limiting air pollution emissions of passenger vehicles

• An item allowing project developers to bypass judicial environmental reviews if they pay a fee

• A measure deeming offshore oil and gas projects automatically compliant with the National Environmental Policy Act

• A modified version of the REINS Act, which would increase congressional power to overturn major regulations

• A scheme to punish so-called sanctuary cities by withholding federal grants

• An increase on Federal Employees Retirement System contribution rate for new civil servants who refuse to become at-will employees

• A measure seeking to extend the suspension of permanent price support authority for farmers

• A requirement forcing sale of all the electric vehicles used by the Post Office

• A change to annual geothermal lease sales and to geothermal royalties

• A proposal for a mining road in Alaska

• Authorization for the executive branch to reorganize federal agencies

• New fee for federal worker unions’ use of agency resources

• Transfer of space shuttle to a nonprofit in Houston from the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum

Streaming hours well spent


“Zero Day,” on Netflix, is the political opus that “Mountainhead” was not. Robert De Niro is magnificent as a former president who is called out of retirement to investigate a nationwide cyberattack.

“Mountainhead,” by the way, started out with an interesting premise but quickly devolved into a rather silly black comedy.

In “Long Way Home,” on Apple TV+, Ewan McGregor and his old friend Charley Boorman, starting in Scotland, ride classic old motorcycles across seventeen countries of northern and eastern Europe. It’s good, lightweight fun. It’s also a fine travelogue that gets us into some places where tourists don’t often go — northern Norway, Finland, Lithuania, Estonia, and Latvia.

Drone photography has done wonders for travel documentaries.

After all, what is comfort food for?



Fried barley biscuit with fixin’s


Especially on a diet, there is only so much that a mortal can do to fend off the heathen craving for bread and wine. Yesterday, a friend in California who had no idea that I’m on a diet sent me this text:

“I got a loaf of organic sourdough batard, some organic avocado oil mayonnaise, some Irish Kerry Gold butter, and some prosecco from Spain. I also got a bottle of organic Merlot.”

That, and the news, sent me over the edge. I tried to work out how to get maximum comfort from, say, 900 calories or less.

Fried barley biscuits were the solution: flour made from hulled barley, a little olive oil, and nonfat milk. Frying the biscuits in a little peanut oil made the biscuits a little less dry than if I had baked them.

Ignorance and folly

One of the most horrifying images I’ve seen in months was the White House photo of Trump, Vance, Rubio and Hegseth lying their ignorant asses off for the cameras. It would be hard to find four greater fools and sicker souls anywhere on the planet, and yet there they were, in the White House.

MAGA types probably still believe Trump’s lies and triumphalism. But I give the media high credit for starting to get the truth out so fast that by Sunday morning, on the talk shows, Trump’s goons had to start walking things back.

One of my biggest concerns is terrorism. Iran doesn’t have the capability of a military response far from their own borders. They’ll have to retaliate on the cheap, and that means terrorism. The Washington Post took up that subject this morning: A weakened Iran could turn to assassination and terrorism to strike back.

I hope gasoline prices jump to $11 a gallon. Gasoline prices are one of the few things that the American ignorati can understand.


Fools, rushing in

Take that, Ezra Klein



Ezra Klein in attention-seeking mode. Source: Wikimedia Commons.


All liberal pundits have an inherent conflict of interest, a constant temptation that tends to lead them astray. Those of us who read the output of the punditry must always be alert to that conflict. It’s that competing for attention may sometimes override their integrity and wisdom. They have to be at least a little provocative.

We’re all familiar with the extreme versions of this on the right. Think Rudy Giuliani, or Marjorie Taylor Greene, or Lauren Boebert. They have no integrity at all. Their entire schtick is about theatrics for the sake of getting attention. Ezra Klein, certainly, has too much integrity to go that far — though I think it’s true that part of what led formerly serious pundits such as Matt Taibbi and Glenn Greenwald off the right-wing edge of the earth is that they went where the attention is.

Klein’s bid for more attention was his book Abundance, published earlier this year. He apparently calculated, quite correctly, that there was a lot of attention to be had, as a liberal, for arguing that regulation was behind shortages of things such as housing.

Klein got his butt kicked in an interview this morning in the New York Times. It’s Ross Douthat interviewing Lina Kahn, who was head of the Federal Trade Commission under President Biden.

Douthat says: “There’s been a really stark division between people who want to organize liberal thinking around antimonopoly, anti-corporate power thinking, and people, like my colleague Ezra Klein, who have been arguing basically that the Democratic Party doesn’t have a strategy for dealing with the intense thicket of regulatory obstacles to building things and homes and factories in America.”

Khan (who I think is much smarter than Douthat, by the way), says: “Look, we need to talk in a market-by-market way, but if you are offering a diagnosis that is also suspiciously quiet about the role of corporate power, I think that should raise some questions as well.”

Some examples

Kahn is being subtle, and she is being fair. She is saying that Klein is ignoring the many ways that corporate power, in addition to regulation, leads to a shortage of affordable housing. I asked ChatGPT 4o to list some of the ways corporate interests inflate the cost of housing and the cost of renting:

• Large corporate entities — private equity firms, real estate investment trusts (REITs), hedge funds — have increasingly purchased single-family homes and rental properties, particularly after the 2008 financial crisis.

• Large developers and investment firms often buy and hold land (especially in growing urban fringes) without building, waiting for values to rise.

• Corporate developers increasingly construct entire neighborhoods of single-family homes intended solely for rent, not sale.

• A handful of large firms dominate sectors like building materials, cement, and lumber distribution, contributing to inflated construction costs.

• Corporate landlords and real estate lobbies (e.g. National Multifamily Housing Council) invest heavily in lobbying to block rent control, eviction moratoria, and tenant union protections.

• Some large landlords use rental pricing software (e.g. RealPage’s YieldStar) to algorithmically set rent levels and discourage undercutting.

Klein is on probation now

Klein, in my view, has traded a chunk of his credibility in trying to buy more attention. To me, this calls into question his integrity as well as his credibility. This can be a slippery slope, the slope that corrupted Greenwald and Taibbi so badly that only the right-wing mediasphere can stomach them.

This is happening at a time when corporate-owned media are increasingly pressuring their liberal pundits to compromise themselves to increase their appeal to right-wing readers. This is why Paul Krugman left the New York Times. It’s why Lillian Rubin left the Washington Post.

Let’s hope that Klein comes to his senses and doesn’t slip down that slope.

I have bonded with my ATV



The meadow across the road. Click here for high-resolution version.

I was embarrassed for even wanting an ATV. I was embarrassed when I bought one. It seemed like a trashy thing to have. But I’ve had it for two months now, and I haven’t regretted it for a minute.

It gets me outdoors much more. I don’t zoom around and make a lot of noise. I even installed a “silencer” on the muffler to make the ATV run quieter. I go slow to see what I can see. I have never even used fifth gear. I go places I would never go during snake season for fear of stepping on a snake. I’m getting to know individual trees. I’m learning where the blooming things are. It’s even a social thing, because sometimes a neighbor and I ride together.

The valley in which I live, with its two ridges, is a lot like a tiny state park. There are between two and three miles of roads and trails, two small bridges suitable only for tractors and ATV’s, and two fords across small streams. There are two springs with deep pools where frogs and tadpoles live. There’s an observation tower on one of the ridges that neighbors built. I’ve helped install antennas on top of the tower for emergency use. There is solar power in the tower. A VHF radio that I provided is installed there permanently. I have a rugged HF transceiver that I can take to the tower in case the electrical grid ever goes down (far from impossible during my lifetime).

The ATV is a 2001 Honda Rancher 350 with four-wheel drive and electric shift. I was extremely lucky to find a classic 25-year-old ATV in like-new condition. It’s a beast, though it feels friendly. It often reminds me of riding a horse — sitting on a saddle, feet on foot rests that feel like stirrups, knees clamped against the machine’s chest, watching out for overhanging limbs that might slap me in the face, sometimes rising in the stirrups for a better look up ahead.


⬆︎ Rose of Sharon in my backyard. Click here for high-resolution version.


⬆︎ Butterfly weed in the meadow. Click here for high-resolution version.


⬆︎ The backyard at the abbey at 7:20 a.m. Click here for high-resolution version.

Trump’s trashy, and revealing, parade



Click here for larger version. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

What did we learn yesterday? When the time comes (and it certainly could), will Americans take to the streets in numbers great enough to do a proper Mussolini on Trump?

Halfway to the tipping point?

Erica Chenoweth, a Harvard political scientist, says that nonviolent protests lead to change once 3.5 percent of the population join nonviolent protests.

It has been very hard to find a total for the number of people who participated in “No Kings” protests yesterday. Axios reports 5 million. Other news source just say “millions.” How many people were at Trump’s parade in Washington yesterday? The White House itself said that 250,000 “patriots” attended.

Alt National Park Service said on Facebook that there were 11 million people at No Kings protests. I am highly skeptical of that number; we don’t know how it was derived. I also don’t know how Axios arrived at the 5 million figure, but it’s probably conservative. We easily seem to be halfway to what it would take to drive Trump out of office.

We’re just getting started.

If Trump’s parade cost $45 million, and 250,000 were there to watch, then the parade cost $180 per person. I hope they had a miserable time.

Trump must be furious

I watched ABC’s evening news to see how they played yesterday’s events. ABC correctly led with the assassination in Minnesota and the manhunt for the killer. Next was Israel-Iran, and after that the No Kings protests and Trump’s parade. Trump no doubt wanted violence in Washington so that troops could crush it and make him look strong. He didn’t get it. Instead he got upstaged by other events, bigtime.

There were reports that Trump was savaged in social media because his parade was a $45 million flop. Fox News quoted someone in the White House, who said that the No Kings protests were “a complete and utter failure with minuscule attendance.” Outside the Fox bubble, it was very much the other way around.

Who is more angry?

I have not been able to turn up any reports of violence yesterday by those taking part in the No King’s protests. The violence was from the other side — the shootings in Minnesota; vehicles driven into crowds in San Francisco and Culpepper, Virginia; and shots fired in Salt Lake City. Something happened in Portland, Oregon, but as far as I can tell it didn’t amount to much. The photos I’ve seen from inside the No Kings protest don’t show angry people. It looks more like a party. But we’ve still got three long, hot summers of Trump to get through — 2026, 2027, and 2028.

Trump is weak

Increasingly Trump is exposed as an idiot surrounded by radical but feckless idiots. Their batting average of successes to backfires, walk-backs, and back-downs is hilarious.

They wanted leftist violence in Los Angeles but instead got up-close video of a U.S. senator wrestled onto the floor and handcuffed by Kristi Noem’s goons. Putin ignores Trump. Natanyahu ignores Trump. Instead of the instant peace Trump promised, there is escalating war. China outmaneuvers him. Europe outmaneuvers him. Economists say we should brace for price increases this summer. Oil prices are up 7 percent because of Israel and Iran. Trump has started chickening out on deportations after corporate America somehow managed to remind him how much corporations depend on immigrant labor. His glorious parade fizzled. Violence by his brownshirts only stokes, rather than intimidates, the resistance. “Trump is wrapping up 100 days of historic failure,” Dana Milbank writes in the Washington Post.

I can imagine a scenario in which Trump more or less gives up, in which his hotheads such as Stephen Miller and Kristi Noem quit and go home in a frustrated rage, and in which Trump just surfs out his term and concentrates on sucking up money rather than destroying the American democracy. But I also can imagine a scenario in which he doubles down and continues to deploy the the authoritarian playbook.

But, based on what happened yesterday, I think the American people understand that, working together, we are much stronger than Trump.

The consequences of truth-telling



Terry Moran interviews Trump, April 29, 2025. Official White House photo.

The Washington Post has reported that Terry Moran will not be returning to ABC. Moran was suspended after a post on “X” that was critical of Trump and Stephen Miller.

As a retired newspaperman, I well understand why news organizations (other than, of course, right-wing propaganda organs such as Fox News) must defend their reputation for objectivity. Those are the rules, and according to those rules Moran went too far.

But we have rules, and we have truth. One of the reasons we are where we are today is that the responsible media, for years (ever since Fox News came on line in 1996), have been unable to tell the truth because of their rules about bias and objectivity. The lords of right-wing propaganda strangled the responsible media with its own principles. Thus the fascist movement could lie constantly and laugh all the way to the bank, and to the White House. The responsible media could not bring themselves to plainly call a lie a lie and then explain the purpose of the lie (which they understood perfectly well but wouldn’t say). The right wing has to lie. To them their lies are beautiful. Ethically they couldn’t care less. The responsible media avoid it at all costs.

The pathetic irony is that Terry Moran told the truth, a truth that is so perfectly obvious to rational, morally sane people that it hardly needs to be said.

There’s another thing. In reporting on Moran’s post on “X,” the responsible media were squeamish about even reporting what Moran said. They’d quote some of the post, but the context was never clear, and it was never clear whether they were reporting the complete post.

I’ve included a screen shot of the complete post.

I am terrified about what is going on in Los Angeles. I’m also terrified that things could be even worse on Saturday, because of Trump’s military parade (which Gavin Newsome rightly called “vulgar”) and the protests. Over the next few days we stand to learn a lot about the intentions of the Trump White House and the current appetite of the American people for putting up with it.

A glimpse of the post-Trump future?



Source: Wikimedia Commons

As Karis Nemick in the television series Andor reminded us, authoritarianism is always brittle. Though Trump is surrounded by some of the most eager and rabid — but also the most incompetent, the most deranged, and the most corrupt — lackeys in American history, the future of authoritarianism in America is tied to the fate of one and only one person — Donald Trump. Authoritarianism in America has a single point of failure.

Trump is 78 years old. For his last year or so in office he will be a lame duck. In 42 months he will be gone (if he doesn’t die first from too many cheeseburgers and milkshakes).

There will be (there already is, actually) a fierce competition to become the next Trump and to keep the movement going. J.D. Vance, of course, wants to be the new Trump. I’m skeptical that Vance has got what that would take. Trump, it seems to me, wants a dynasty, not a functional movement. Don Jr. would like to be the next Trump, and it’s hard to imagine Trump supporting anyone else. I’m also skeptical that Junior has what it would take.

One of the things we learned from this week’s grotesque warfare between Trump and Elon Musk is how much Trump is hated by elites. Only Musk, at this point, has the power to turn on Trump. But, inevitably, that’s going to change. In three years or so, Trump’s power is going to be gone. Either his term will end, he will die in office, he will be assassinated, or unexpected and unpredictable events will somehow bring him down. Either MAGA creates and anoints another charismatic leader, or MAGA fragments from schism and goes into decline.

Whatever happens, once Trump is perceived as weak and vulnerable, an ugly tide will turn against him. A thousand savage wolves will come for Trump, both to hasten him off the stage and to extract revenge. Trump will be torn to pieces unless a MAGA successor loyal to Trump can be found. Historically, the picture is rarely pretty when authoritarians leave office or lose their power.

A great weakness of the Trump regime is that it is dangerously deficient in cold, pragmatic competence. The Nazis, without their cold, pragmatic competence, would never have gotten as far as they did. The Trump regime, on the other hand, is a pig circus of incompetent narcissists trying to generate video for Fox News. Without the pig circus that feeds the media, there’d not be much left of the Trump regime — not much that could get anything done, anyway.

Here I must add that my predictions about Trump have always been too optimistic. I just could not imagine that he could outlast all the many things that should have destroyed him politically and put him in prison. And even though I have a low, low opinion of at least half of the American population, my opinion was not low enough.

As the commentariat have pointed out, in the Trump-Musk pig circus we are seeing a struggle between MAGA, which wants to control us and dominate us, and the tech oligarchs, who want to own us, control us, and dominate us. Working together, their power is horrifying. But they have shown that their alliance is brittle. We must hope that they continue to try to dominate each other rather than work together.