Updating our adaptations



A Facebook meme


“Hello. My name is David, and I live in a fascist country.”

“Hello, David.”


Only as a herd are they strong

There is a well developed theory of what science calls complex adaptive systems. Each human being is an agent — meaning an autonomous unit with goals and capable of action — in a complex adaptive system. Agents live or die, wither or thrive, according to their ability to accurately judge the environment and adapt. When conditions change, agents must accurately assess the change and determine how to re-optimize their behavior in order to live and thrive, rather than wither and die, because the changed conditions may well be dangerous.

Agents compete for resources. Some agents use violence and deceit. Some rely on their wits, their ability to hide, or their ability to run fast. The wary may survive and thrive. The slow and foolish may not.

In complex adaptive systems, agents often have tags that identify what kind of agent they are. Agents may use flags to communicate with other agents. A deer’s appearance tags it as a deer. If you see a deer’s white tail, that’s a flag. The flag probably says to a baby deer, “There is a threat nearby. Run, and follow me.”

In human beings, skin color is a permanent tag that we are born with. Some tags are social. Tattoos are social tags that make some kind of subculture statement. Red MAGA caps are another kind of social tag. They help members of a herd identify each other while communicating a vague threat to non-members of the herd. Some agents can be safest if they fly under the radar by avoiding tags. That’s what camouflage is about.

Trump appeals to his witless and largely feckless herd of followers precisely because, as individuals, they have poor adaptations, and Trump promises to empower them. They have done something very clever. As a herd, acting in concert and following Trump blindly, they have found great power. It’s a collective adaptation, controlled by the uber-agent Trump, and it has been effective for bullying the rest of us and keeping us down.

But we are not defenseless. As agents, we are smarter than they are. Their uber-agent, Trump, is deteriorating, fast. If we don’t find a way to beat them, if we don’t develop adaptations better than theirs, quickly, and take our power back, then it’s our own fault. So, how do we adapt?

We have to be civil

As liberals, caring and kindness are core moral values. We are capable of being civil even with people whom we find disgusting. Civility is a form of adaptation, even a kind of tag or camouflage. Civility comes with benefits. It keeps us from squandering our energy and our social capital on nonproductive conflict. Civility doesn’t have to be sincere to be effective.

How it is possible to be civil to someone when what you really want is to knock the living hell out of them? To want to knock the living hell out of people who deserve it is surely irresistibly human. And yet, especially because we are liberals rather than fascists, we believe that to be treated with civility is a basic human right. Even murderers, or Trumps, put in prison should be treated with civility. While treating MAGA types with civility as individuals, we must be as politically brutal as the law allows. They, after all, have gone way beyond the law in pursuing political brutality. There are reasons why they see us as weak. To be seen as weak in a dangerous environment invites even greater danger.

I live in a red rural county, surrounded by MAGA Republicans. If I was rude to them because of what they are, it would gain me nothing. They would treat me twice as rudely in return, mark me as an outsider, and abuse me in any way they thought they could get away with. But authoritarians are not like us. Caring and kindness outside their in-group is not wired into them the way it’s wired into liberals. They have a fear reaction toward out-groups, toward anyone who is different or who looks different. But if you look more or less like them, and if you are civil, and if you don’t touch one of their many triggers, they will be civil in return.

It’s very telling, really, that my Republican neighbors barely get along with each other. It’s in their authoritarian wiring. They’re always feuding. They make up, for a while, and then they feud again. I think they find pleasure in it. Property lines and dogs are the usual fuel, but they’re always on the lookout for something to get offended over. They don’t seem to notice that David, that nice Democrat, is the only one who doesn’t spat with them. As one neighbor said about me once, after they’d chased down, berated, and threatened to shoot the driver of a car who ignored the hand-painted 10 mph speed signs on our mile-long private road, “David don’t make no trouble.”

Indeed, David don’t. David has a lot of experience with white authoritarians. Only a few — two, actually, in the last sixteen years — have been pigs enough to try to provoke me or threaten me. The Republicans in this county actually like me. They treat me with respect, they call me “sir,” and they don’t see me as dangerous. But I hope I’m more dangerous than they know.

A common adaptation of gay people is to be seen as a nice person, even “sweet.” This is an adaptation often used by those with little power. It’s aimed at making their environment safer. They look for ways to make themselves needed. It’s a good adaptation when other agents are potentially dangerous. It’s also good for communities, because people who are needed do good things. Rural black people, I have learned, often have similar adaptations. Children sometimes do, and some women do. It’s a way of staying out of the way of abuse. Everyone could learn from that.

About 66 million Americans voted against Trump. Even if MAGA wanted to beat us down, they can’t beat all of us down because they need us. We’d do well to find little ways of reminding them of that. Part of the divide is that liberals as a group have superior skills, superior educations, and more resources. There is no nuclear accelerator here in my county, because no one would no how to operate it. You will find nuclear accelerators in liberal enclaves — Berkeley, say, or at Palo Alto near Stanford.

Trump and Stephen Miller think we don’t need the 20 million immigrants that they want to deport. Corporate America may see that differently. The propaganda tells the MAGA herd that immigrants are here because liberals opened all the doors and invited them in. Nope. Immigrants are here because of corporate America’s need for cheap labor. Blaming liberals is corporate propaganda. Corporations work very hard to keep people from knowing who works in the slaughterhouses, who works in the fields, and who runs the sewing machines. Immigrants serve two purposes — they are a supply of cheap labor, and they are the powerless scapegoats that fascists require.

You can count on this: If the Trump administration actually goes through with a plan to deport 20 million immigrants, then new scapegoats will have to be found. Not to mention someone to work in the slaughterhouses, work in the fields, and run the sewing machines. Deporting millions of people would cost a huge amount of money. It also would require places that look just like concentration camps, which they will try to keep us from seeing.

Payback

There is no contradiction between civility and payback. It’s actually one of the oldest rules of adaptation in the book — speak softly and carry a big stick. If we are going to beat today’s fascist Republicans, then we are going to have to play some serious hardball. With no insult to Kamala Harris intended, the people who have been recruited into fascism don’t get “joy.” The willingness to kick some ass is what’s joyful to them.

I’m not saying that women can’t play hardball. Nancy Pelosi does, magnificently, as did Margaret Thatcher and Indira Gandhi. Hillary Clinton probably would have played good hardball as president, though her track record was more about diplomacy (which certainly sometimes involves hardball) rather than plain old political hardball. If Democrats want to run a woman for president again, it had better be a woman with a proven, and publicly known, track record of hardball.

Lyndon Johnson played hardball. Bill Clinton did, until he was politically castrated, caught with his britches down. What would you expect Republicans to do upon catching Bill Clinton with his britches down? Why don’t we do the same to them? At how many crimes has Trump been caught red-handed and even with his britches down? One of the reasons I like Beto O’Rourke is that he is hardened by Texas politics. He radiates the Lyndon Johnson style of hardball playing. Can Gavin Newsome play hardball? I don’t think we know for sure. Can Pete Buttigieg play hardball? I suspect he can. He has been tested in Afghanistan, though not yet in politics. I never saw Barack Obama as a strong president. I see him as weak one, because he was afraid to play hardball with Republicans. I suspect that Jimmy Carter is seen as a weak president because he didn’t play hardball.

Timidity in playing hardball is a fatal characteristic of today’s Democratic Party. If Biden’s Justice Department had moved quickly and aggressively to try Trump for his crimes, Trump would be in jail now. We didn’t. Instead the Justice Department pussy-footed around and played croquet while Trump and his lawyers played hardball. And now here we are, paying a terrible price. A criminal con man who should have been in prison by now will instead return to the White House.

Ken, whom I mentioned in yesterday’s post, is onto this theme. Hardly anyone else is. For whatever reason, liberals today devalue and suppress old-fashioned, masculine, high-testosterone hardball and the high-testosterone pursuit of liberal goals. We’re paying dearly for that, politically. Even young men are now moving toward fascism. If we’re ever going to beat the Republicans and win men back, we’ll have to beat the living daylights out of the fascists, at hardball. We also need to make a spectacle of it, as Trump does. Would young males rather go to a weenie roast and sing Kumbaya? Or to a football game, and get that testosterone rush?

Hardball is scalable. Even in my small-pond experience as a Democratic county chair, I had to play some hardball. If someone broke the rules and did some dirty politics (I had two serious cases of it in six years as county chair), I paid them back, and I found ways to do it without breaking the rules. That was a skill I learned in my years in the hyper-competitive environment of the San Francisco media. Many tried to eat my lunch. No one succeeded. I took them all down by beating them at hardball, even as I preserved my reputation for integrity and broke no rules. In the corporate world, petty tyrants who break the rules will eventually make a fatal mistake, and the HR department will then get rid of them for you. My super-power here in Trumpland is understanding how to play hardball while enforcing, rather than breaking, the rules. I know how the system works and how to work the system. Most rural fascists have no idea how to do that. They outsource their agency by joining the fascist herd. If they win together, as they did on November 5, they also will lose together, if we stick it to them.

Let’s be quick

Part of the trick of out-competing other agents is to adapt more quickly than they can. We liberals have been terrible at that.

Trump and his fascists just won an election, but they do not have a clear path to total and everlasting domination — not unless we let them have it, anyway. They want us to see them as invulnerable and to see their domination as inevitable. But many things are going to go wrong for them, and many things are going to stand it their way. Our job is to move faster than them and to maximize the damage from every obstacle they hit. The media will repeat their lies for them. We still have not figured out how to counter that. We must try, perhaps by shaming the media. We must profit from fascist mistakes. We must outsmart them. We must move without hesitation when what is needed is clear.

Nice people can play hardball. Unless we give the fascist machine time to corrupt the law, the law is on our side. We can play hardball without breaking the rules and without breaking the law.

Everybody I know is angry. Let’s channel our anger. We are not rabbits. We are apex predators. We have the numbers, the resources, and the smarts. Let’s start now, and let’s beat the living damn daylights out of them.

It looks like we’re the rebels now


How do we make sense of what, to a morally sane person caught up in a fascist movement, is incomprehensible? As my friend Ken said in a long phone call this morning (he lives in Scotland), “There is something fundamentally sick about America.”

I very much agree. And yet, as morally sane people who try to understand the world rather than fall for propaganda, we’ve got to figure out how to deal with this new situation in which we find ourselves.

Before our phone call, we each had made some notes on our first attempts to grapple with the reality of Trump regaining power through the democratic process. Trump didn’t steal this election. It appears that he even won the popular vote this time, as opposed to regaining power because of the anti-democratic quirks of the Electoral College.

Here are the six points with which I started our conversation:

1. Self care is extremely important right now. In the comments on Heather Cox Richardson’s post last night as votes were being counted, someone said that she couldn’t bear to face the morning and that she had decided to “check out.” It’s unlikely that she’s the only person feeling that level of despair.

2. Mutual support is extremely important right now. We must remind ourselves that we’re all in this together, and that we’re not a tiny minority. As the vote stands at the moment, 66,254,540 people voted against Trump. That’s no small number for organized resistance.

3. Our future is now highly unpredictable. We don’t yet know what Trump and the Republican Party will do with the enormous amount of power that they now have. We know what they have said they will do. The chaos variable is much higher now. Our urge for self-care may tempt us to tune out and give up. That’s just what they want.

4. Why did I not expect this? The explanation that is kindest to myself, and no doubt to millions of others, is that such a fundamental sickness on this scale is incomprehensible to those I don’t hesitate to call decent human beings, as opposed to those who just voted away their right to be called decent human beings.

5. Whom can we trust in a sea of propaganda? I already had written off cable as not to be trusted. I already was increasingly distrustful of the two organizations at the apex of our media — the New York Times and the Washington Post. It appears that the Washington Post, for example (or at least the Post’s billionaire owner), pre-capitulated to Trump by deciding not to endorse anyone. Trump hates “the liberal media.” The media are going to be under extreme pressure, and I don’t think they have the power or even the smarts to put up much resistance, even if their billionaire owners would allow it.

6. Whose are the voices that will help lead us out of this? I am thinking of Winston Churchill’s voice on the radio. For any kind of effective resistance, the 66,254,540 people who voted against Trump now need leadership, coordinated action, and — hope.

Here are some of Ken’s thoughts from our conversation this morning. For the record, he is Ken Ilgunas, author of three beautiful books and someone whose articles and commentaries have been published in many places including the New York Times. He has a Substack newsletter, and he recently started a podcast.

Ken’s thoughts

1. We are the rebels now. It is more fun to be part of the rebel alliance rather than the empire.

2. There is a possibility now for democratic reform. Maybe every democracy, like every alcoholic, needs a rock bottom.

3. I can’t comprehend my own country. I despair of the incomprehensibility. (We both used the word incomprehensible to describe our reactions to the news.)

4. There was no democratic process for the Harris/Walz ticket. Harris chose Walz, and Harris was merely the default replacement after Biden withdrew. Voters did not have the choices they would have had, if, say, Biden had decided much earlier not to run again and if there had been a fresh Democratic primary for choosing who would succeed Biden.

5. I am annoyed with progressive culture; for example, for its inability to have a real conversation about immigration.

6. This opens a new pathway to my Liberal Warrior book proposal.

Liberal Warrior

Ken has been shopping a book proposal with the title Liberal Warrior, a book that will criticize the progressive left for its cultural denigration of men (men, he believes, are not “hegemonic,” but have been “annoyed to the right.”) And it calls for liberals to re-embrace aspects of traditional masculinity (think U.S. Grant, Teddy Roosevelt, and MLK Jr.). In other words: Democrats and progressives need male voters, values, and activists.

The F-word

Ken and I agree (as, I think, do historians of fascism) that Trump is a fascist and that he used fascist methods and fascist rhetoric to gain political power. But it also remains to be seen whether the United States will become a full-on fascist country under Trump. All we can do is pay close attention to what he does as opposed to what he threatens to do. If Trump actually does follow through on Project 2025, and with Elon Musk’s plutocratic agenda, and with the agendas of depraved MAGA heavyweights such as Stephen Miller, that surely would quality as fascism — making the Department of Justice and the FBI agents of Trump’s agenda, drastically cutting corporate taxes and cutting the federal budget by trillions of dollars, attacking social services such as Medicaid and probably attempting to privatize Social Security and Medicare, gutting if not outright eliminating the Education Department and the Environmental Protection Agency, deporting millions of people, using the law to diminish individual freedoms and impose so-called Christian values, using government power to excuse racism and sexism, and keeping the people enraged, drunk on propaganda, and at each other’s throats. Do the American people even understand what they just voted for?

Will the deplorables get the shaft?

Something like 45 million people now benefit from Obamacare and the expansion of Medicaid. Many millions of those people voted for Trump. If they lose those benefits, how will they react? If Trump does indeed impose huge tariffs on Chinese imports, how will Walmart and Amazon shoppers respond? If people see their Social Security and Medicare benefits reduced or threatened, how will they respond? In a full-on fascist scenario with meaningless elections in 2026 and 2028, how would the deplorables register their surprise at being conned and shafted?

Whom will they blame?

MAGA politics — fascist politics — requires scapegoats. With Trump and Republicans in control of all three branches of government, whom will they blame if things go badly wrong? What would be the consequences for whomever they blame? Not only would they use the law against their scapegoats, we have a country full of brownshirts eager for their orders.

The world

Is it over for Ukraine? Will the United States withdraw from NATO? After Ukraine, what would Putin do next? In the July 2024 issue of The Atlantic, Jonathan Rauch wrote about how The World Is Realigning. This is extremely important and potentially extremely dangerous. Under Trump, it would appear that the United States has abandoned democracy, both at home and abroad.

What’s the worst case scenario?

This could all end in firing squads and political prisoners and the Putin-style looting of the American economy. Or it could be a harsh reminder of our democratic American values and a blood transfusion that flushes out the sickness infecting American society as a whole, the very same sickness that once led to an American civil war.

It all depends on what Trump and the Republican Party do with power. It also depends on what the rest of us do.

Why I’m optimistic about the election



Source: Wikimedia Commons

A couple of friends have told me recently that they wish they had my optimism about which way this election is going. I make no predictions. But I see many reasons for optimism.

Ever since Kamala Harris became the nominee, it is hard to imagine things going better for the Democratic Party. Harris hit the ground running, reversed the sense of doom that we all felt after President Biden’s debate performance, and inspired a huge wave of enthusiasm and political momentum. The polls started moving our way.

Meanwhile, the Trump campaign has been doing pretty much everything wrong. It has been one stupid move after another. For whatever reason, Trump has chosen to throw out red meat to inflame the people who are going to vote for him anyway, instead of reaching out for votes that he might otherwise not have gotten. He keeps infuriating women voters, and in two days’ work he probably has permanently reversed the defection of Latinos from the Democratic to the Republican party. Best of all, the once-forbidden word “fascist” has been rehabilitated and forcefully injected into the national conversation. Even the New York Times was forced to run pieces (quoting experts, of course) acknowledging that, yes, Trump is a fascist. (That the New York times was the last, rather than the first, to tell us that Trump is a fascist says a lot about how completely useless our political media have become.)

I don’t pay much attention to the polls this close to the election. Again this year, as they did in 2022, Republicans have cranked out a bunch of trash polls to convince MAGA voters that Trump is sure to win, even if he loses, and that therefore that the election was stolen.

A few days ago, Jen O’Malley Dillon, Kamala Harris’ campaign chair, put out a YouTube video about the numbers (see below). Yes, of course, someone in her position has to express optimism at this point and stress the importance of voting. But O’Malley also refers to some numbers from the campaign’s internal polling. You can be sure that the campaign’s internal polling is laser-focused and of higher quality that the public polls. The internal polls are essential to campaign decisions about where to concentrate their efforts. If you’ve been stressing out about the election, then maybe you’ll feel better after watching the video.

But I’ve also been thinking some about the worst-case scenario. It’s an ugly scenario, but in the end we win.

If the American people really are so stupid as to vote for a fascist who intends to destroy the American democracy, turn us into Russia (see Fiona Hill in Politico, October 28), make elections obsolete, loot the country, and put billionaires and whack-jobs in charge of everything (thinking that this will save America!) then obviously the American people are going to have to learn things the hard way. If Trump and company get back into power, then no election will ever get them out. He even told people at his rallies that they won’t have to vote anymore, because he’ll “fix” things.

I told a friend at lunch yesterday that, if Trump gets back into power, that I think it would take Americans four to eight years to get our democracy back. After four years of Trump and a non-election in 2028, it should be clear even to MAGA cultists that they’ve been conned, that the economy has been trashed, and that the rights of everyone except for billionaires have been suspended. Non-MAGA Americans, upon seeing that elections no longer work, would clearly see what must be done. The only recourse would be a revolt, with general strikes and millions of people in the streets.

The history of how tyrants are deposed has been well studied. Andrea Kendall-Taylor and Erica Frantz have written in How Autocracies Fall that autocrats have become increasingly vulnerable to mass revolts. When Putin and his oligarchs took over Russia, the job was made much easier by the fact that the Russian people have no history of democracy. A tyrant in the Kremlin was just the same-old same-old for Russians. But that is not true of Americans. Democracy is in our bones (most of us, anyway). Anybody who takes democracy from us would have hell to pay. Nor would we Americans be in it alone. We have Canada to the north, and we have our NATO allies, who hate Trump just as much as we do. If the MAGA people ever got the civil war that they seem to want, they would lose. And maybe they’d learn a lesson that they’d remember up to a hundred years or so.

So that’s why I’m not panicking. Even if we wake up to a nightmare on November 6 (or however long it takes to count the votes), we’ll get our democracy back, whatever it takes. For decades, farsighted people have warned us about what fascism would look like if it came to America. And now we can see the whites of fascist eyes. Maybe it’s just denial, but I still find it almost impossible to believe that Americans actually would choose such a thing, especially now that we can call it what it is.

Yes, they have a plan for stealing the election. They will try, through legal maneuvers, to get it before the fascist-majority Supreme Court. Or, through dirty tricks in the states, they will try to throw the election to the House of Representatives. We do need to brace ourselves for that. Unless the election is a landslide for Harris, an attempt to steal the election is inevitable. Trump was even foolish enough to refer to a “secret plan” with the Republican speaker of the House. If they lose the election but succeed with a steal, the revolt will start on Day 1.

Journalism for the few



Dorothy Thompson leaves the White House after a visit with Roosevelt, May 1940. Source: Wikimedia Commons.


Today’s substack from Heather Cox Richardson contains a sharp warning about what Trump will do to those who oppose him, if he ever gets power again:

“On Saturday, September 7, Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump predicted that his plan to deport 15 to 20 million people currently living in the United States would be ‘bloody.’ He also promised to prosecute his political opponents, including, he wrote, lawyers, political operatives, donors, illegal voters, and election officials. Retired chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley told journalist Bob Woodward that Trump is ‘a fascist to the core … the most dangerous person to this country.’

“On October 14, Trump told Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo that he thought enemies within the United States were more dangerous than foreign adversaries and that he thought the military should stop those ‘radical left lunatics’ on Election Day.”

Our mediocre media soft-pedals Trump’s overt fascism. Most Americans are strangely unconcerned about what Trump intends to do if he ever gets power again, because journalists are afraid that to tell them would sound shrill and unobjective. We even have a new term for how the media normalize Trump’s depravity to avoid sounding shrill — “sanewashing.”

But scholars like Heather Cox Richardson don’t have to care what Republicans or centrists think about what she writes. She writes for a smaller set of people. She has, I believe, 1.3 million subscribers on Substack, as well as 2 million followers on Facebook. That’s a lot of people, but it’s only 1.3 percent of the American population.

Richardson writes today about Dorothy Thompson, a journalist who was expelled from Germany in 1934. Thompson was a rare journalist who risked sounding shrill when what she was writing about was gruesomely ugly. She had written in 1931 that Hitler was a man of “startling insignificance.”

In Harper’s Magazine in 1934, she wrote:

“He is formless, almost faceless, a man whose countenance is a caricature, a man whose framework seems cartilaginous, without bones. He is inconsequent and voluble, ill poised and insecure. He is the very prototype of the little man.”

It seems that Dorothy Thompson analyzed everyone she met in the same way she analyzed Hitler. She wrote a fascinating piece for Harper’s Magazine in 1941, Who Goes Nazi? She asks us to imagine a parlor game at a large gathering of people. She describes twelve people in the room, whom she labels A through L, and asks whether they would “go Nazi.” She wants us to see how It Could Happen Here. People today are just the same as people were in 1941. For persons A through L, which types seem familiar? Whom do you like, and dislike, the most? Which one is Elon Musk? Is there a Liz Cheney in the room? For those of us who would never go Nazi, why?

It’s an odd paradox, and only the best of journalists and historians can get at it — how it can be that some of history’s greatest monsters also are pathetic little creeps.

Here’s another paradox. Given any major issue, the higher the stakes and the greater the controversy, the harder it is to find out what is really going on. Sources that depend on large audiences have to water things down so as not be accused of taking sides. But, somewhere in the fog of propaganda, there will be a few who are doing their best to get at the truth. Dorothy Thompson did it then. Heather Cox Richardson is doing it now.


Update: The New York Times seems to have had a fit of conscience:

As Election Nears, Kelly Warns Trump Would Rule Like a Dictator: John Kelly, the Trump White House’s longest-serving chief of staff, said that he believed that Donald Trump met the definition of a fascist.


North Carolina in the news


North Carolina, where I live, is normally a backwater. But two things have put North Carolina in the news recently. The first is the devastation caused by Hurricane Helene in the North Carolina mountains near Asheville. The second is the possibility that Kamala Harris will win in North Carolina on November 5. Trump won North Carolina in 2016 and 2020.

It seems that everyone including the media expected the worst damage from Hurricane Helene to be in Florida and areas farther south. But the storm dumped more than 20 inches of rain in some areas of western North Carolina. In those mountains, the streams and rivers often run through narrow valleys, and that’s where the flooding occurred. I live about a hundred miles east of the heavy rain, and it wasn’t very bad here. But a neighbor, who also is the chief of the local volunteer fire department, is among the crews who were sent into western North Carolina to help with rescue and cleanup. He is spending that time helping to recover the bodies of people who drowned, and he says that the final toll will be much higher than what is being reported at present. The state has told people to consider all roads in western North Carolina closed. Even Interstate 40 was partially washed out. The video of the flooding is horrifying, with such things as an entire hospital partially submerged and people standing on the roof.

Trump, and all the Republicans on the North Carolina ballot, are going to be dragged down by the Republican candidate for governor of North Carolina, Mark Robinson. Robinson is such an idiot and such a psychopath that even some Republicans can see what he is in spite of the usual Republican adoration of idiots and psychopaths. Some polls have Robinson running 14 points behind the Democratic candidate for governor, Mark Stein.

Voters in North Carolina sometimes split on statewide races. For example, though Trump carried North Carolina in 2020, North Carolina elected a Democratic governor in the same election, Roy Cooper. Republicans were so terrified of Robinson dragging down the Republican ticket that they tried to get him to withdraw before they decided to double down and back him. North Carolina’s 16 electoral votes are likely to be critical in the 2024 election for president, maybe even decisive.

My unscientific and unquantifiable reading is that North Carolina is very likely to go for Harris. I think there is more Trump fatigue and more Trump remorse than the polls can capture. Republicans who are tired of Trump, or even sick of Trump, have to keep quiet about it or they will catch MAGA hell. I suspect that quite a few women will lie to their menfolk about how they vote. The right-wing North Carolina legislature usually cooks up some sort of bonkers culture war issue to inflame Republicans during election years, such as the “bathroom bill” of 2016. This year there is nothing like that. This year Republicans, poor things, are not quite sure what they’re supposed to be raging about.

As in 2020, this year I’ll be a poll observer for the North Carolina Democratic Party. Early voting in North Carolina starts October 17. In those states where Republicans are motivated to steal elections, lots of lawyers from out of state come in to help keep an eye on things and to stand in the way of Republican attempts to mess with the election. The state party operates a “boiler room” of lawyers in Raleigh who monitor the voting in each county through a system of volunteers. Online training for the volunteers is required. There’s a hotline, and an app, that the volunteers use for reporting to Raleigh. North Carolina statutes allow for poll observers who are permitted inside the voting area. They can listen to (though not interfere with) the interactions between poll workers and voters. They can watch the machines that tabulate the ballots and take photos of the tabulator screens before the polls open and after the polls close so that the number of ballots cast can be monitored. If poll workers turn a voter away, poll observers can follow the voter out of the voting area and inquire about what happened. If a poll observer thinks that poll workers are not following the law, they can politely intercede with the poll’s chief judge — and call the boiler room. I’ll also be attending the meetings of the county board of elections during the canvassing of the vote required by North Carolina law.

In my county, which Trump won by 78 percent in 2020 and 77 percent in 2016, Republicans have very little motive to try anything sneaky. But all of North Carolina’s 100 counties will be monitored by Democratic volunteers and the boiler room in Raleigh. If the vote is close, there is no limit to the dirty tricks that Republicans will use to try to steal the election. Democrats, at both the state and national levels, are very aware this year that Democrats need to win by such large margins that Republicans would be unable to steal the election, even with help from the Supreme Court, which will be slobbering to step in and hand it to Trump if Republicans can find a reason.

A valid centrist narrative does not exist



Source: Wikimedia Commons

Some of the most smug and la-la-foolish people doing great harm in the world these days are the so-called centrists. They think that they are ever so superior to and smarter than the lowly “partisans” to their left and right. But once the right has descended into fascism, depravity, and false reality, a defensible center can no longer exist.

And yet that is where the mainstream media are today. Particularly guilty are the New York Times and the Washington Post, because, as the only newspapers of record left standing, they have a particular responsibility to the truth. The New York Times, having led the crusade to get President Biden to end his campaign for a second term, is now flagrantly applying its double standard to its coverage of Donald Trump. The Washington Post has shown some signs of rethinking its double standard, but the New York Times has not. The Times continues to translate Trump’s babblings into English, covering up what is increasingly obvious — that Trump’s mind is not all there.

Responsible people on the left are now calling out the centrist media for this, for what good it will do. The centrist media haughtily ignore criticism from the left, even as they are terrified by criticism from the right. Heather Cox Richardson directly quotes Trump’s incomprehensible ramblings about child care, as does Sara Libby in the San Francisco Chronicle and Rebecca Solnit in the Guardian.

There is something sentimental about the New York Times’ delusions. It is as though the Times has convinced itself that America today is still a place like Walter Cronkite’s America, a place where a single trusted voice could reach pretty much the entire country. Cronkite was host of the CBS Evening news for 19 years, from 1962 to 1981. He was often called the most trusted man in America. The New York Times craves that kind of trust but supposes that lying to cover for a depraved right is the way to get it.

I have only one comforting thought about this. It’s that historians understand quite well what is happening in the United States today. History will get it right. The malignant failings of the media will be a part of that history.


Here, verbatim, are Trump’s babblings about child care:

“Well I would do that. And we’re sitting down. You know I was somebody. We had Senator Marco Rubio, and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It’s a very important issue. But I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about, that because—look, child care is child care. It’s—couldn’t, you know, it’s something you have to have it—in this country you have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I’m talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they’re not used to—but they’ll get used to it very quickly—and it’s not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they’ll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we’re talking about, including child care, that it’s going to take care. We’re going to have—I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with child care. I want to stay with child care, but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I’m talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just told you about. We’re going to be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive, it’s, relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we’ll be taking in. We’re going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we’ll worry about the rest of the world. Let’s help other people, but we’re going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It’s about Make America Great Again, we have to do it because right now we’re a failing nation, so we’ll take care of it.”


The same way they treat San Francisco



Anne Hidalgo, the socialist mayor of Paris


Apologies… This post contains some coarse language.


The Paris Olympics went just fine. Right-wingers had predicted that it would go very badly. They said that Paris was a cesspool, and that the level of crime would be terrible. According to the Associated Press, 30,000 social media bots in 13 languages were spreading ugly memes about Paris. For example: “Paris, Paris, 1-2-3, go to Seine and make a pee.”

What the mayor of Paris, Anne Hidalgo, said about this won’t be distributed by 30,000 bots on social media. But you can read about it in Le Monde (though the full text of the article is available only to subscribers).

The Times of London (behind a paywall) also wrote about Hidalgo’s interview with Le Monde:

“Fuck reactionaries, fuck the extreme right, fuck all those who want to shut us in a war with everyone against everyone.”

To quote from the Times of London:

Hidalgo told Le Monde that criticism of her was orchestrated by “a reactionary and extreme-right planet” which nourished a “hatred” for Paris because it was the city “of all freedoms, the refuge for LGBTQI+, … a city that has a left-wing woman mayor, and what is more of foreign origin and with dual nationality and an ecologist and feminist to boot.” (Hidalgo was born in Spain.)

This is the same treatment that San Francisco, where I lived for 18 years, has always gotten from right-wingers. Let them say what they want. Let them eat cake, and let them live in Texas.

Truth and falsehood in memes



All the memes in this post came from Facebook.

No matter where a propagandist is on the conservative spectrum, from merely conservative to full-on fascist, it is always necessary to lie. One of the wonderful things about being a liberal is that you don’t have to lie about your values and intentions. To argue for fairness, caring, and equality is easy and can be honest. But arguments for dominance, hierarchy, systemic unfairness, exploitation, and, yes, even cruelty, have to be disguised.

Right-wing propagandists also have to lie about the natures and intentions of the people who oppose them. That’s a part of the right-wing need for scapegoats and demonization.

Here is what J.D. Vance said. He was speaking to Tucker Carlson in 2021:

“We’re effectively run in this country, via the Democrats, via our corporate oligarchs, by a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made, and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable too. And it’s just a basic fact. You look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC, the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children. And how does it make any sense that we’ve turned our country over to people who don’t really have a direct stake in it?”

Can you count the lies? What is Vance even trying to say, in between the lies? I’d put it like this: To be liberal is to be miserable. Liberals are so perverse and fascist in their misery that they align with corporations (!) to make everyone else miserable. The liberal agenda = misery for all. Liberals are illegitimate as citizens. They don’t have a stake in the country and thus should be marginalized. Only authoritarians can be trusted with power, because in a democracy the inferior people that right-wingers demonize can’t be kept down.

Vance singles out Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez not because they are miserable (obviously they’re not) but because they are the kind of people who are scapegoated and demonized in right-wing propaganda.

Only someone without the slightest talent for politics would allow himself to be caught on video saying something like “childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives.” Half a second’s reflection would see what kind of hilarious and effective blowback it would cause outside the right-wing propaganda network.

I have been greatly entertained by the tsunami of cat memes. Cat memes were already a top genre of memes. Vance provided a way for the cat meme genre to be turned against MAGA Republicans. My guess is that these cat memes will even change more than a few votes. Consider the messages behind the cat memes. None of them lie, because they don’t have to. They don’t have to be mean. Instead they convey a much-deserved ridicule in a funny and even heartwarming way. Such a thing would be impossible in right-wing propaganda.

⬇︎ For comparison, consider this right-wing meme that I found this morning in a Republican Facebook group. It tries to be funny but isn’t. The lie is rather obvious — that real men vote for fascists. It demonizes liberals as infantile and feminized. It tries to stoke and draw power from the gender wars. It unintentionally — and embarrassingly, though it goes over their heads — reveals the insecure masculinity of rural, working-class males and offers no remedy for that insecurity other than meanness and fascism.


⬆︎ A Republican meme from Facebook.


Update:

Grace and good judgment



Source: Wikimedia Commons

Well then, here we are. The politics of the American election changed completely in one afternoon. There are two things on my agenda for the day after Biden’s announcement. The first is to heap scorn on the political media for its savage treatment of Biden while merrily changing Trump’s diapers. And the second is to laugh my ankles off at Republican rage over suddenly finding themselves in a Boeing 737 Max over Новосибирск with both engines on fire.

As usual, a historian, not the media, gives the best account. As Heather Cox Richardson wrote this morning:

“In a time of dictators, Trump tried to overthrow the results of the 2020 presidential election and install himself in power against the wishes of the people. President Joe Biden voluntarily turned away from reelection in order to give the people a better shot at preserving our democracy. He demonstrated what it means to put the country first.”

I did not watch the Biden-Trump debate. Biden had done just fine at the State of the Union address on March 7. The uproar in the next day’s papers took me by surprise. In the coming days, though, it was clear that Biden was in fact fading pretty fast. It was possible that the White House had been covering up for him. It inevitably took some time for Democrats in Washington to work out a plan, but the timing was good, with Biden’s withdrawal coming a few days after Republicans had finished making fools of themselves in Milwaukee and right in the middle of their vulgar con-man-plus-hillbilly triumphalism.

Even with a propaganda network that would have made Goebbels proud, it takes time for Republicans to demonize the opposition. They spent years demonizing the Clintons, so effectively that even some Democrats fell for it. Republicans didn’t have much on Biden other than his age, so they went after his son. Then in one afternoon, Republicans’ entire investment in demonization became worthless. No wonder Stephen Miller had a screaming fit on Fox News and Trump complained that now they have to start over.

All of a sudden, after making Biden’s age (81) their biggest issue, Republicans are left with a 78-year-old who falls asleep in front of cameras.

Heather Cox Richardson again:

“The Republicans’ anger reflects that fact that if Biden is off the ticket, they are in yet another pickle. Just last week, the Republicans nominated Donald Trump, who is 78, for president. Having made age their central complaint about Biden, they are now faced with having nominated the oldest candidate in U.S. history, who repeatedly fell asleep at his own nominating convention as well as his criminal trial, who often fumbles words, and who cannot seem to keep a coherent train of thought. Democrats immediately pounced on Trump with all the comments Republicans had been making about Biden. Republicans have already suggested that Trump will not debate Harris, a former prosecutor. ”

As for the media, they were right about Biden. But that doesn’t get them off the hook if they keep normalizing the fascism of Donald Trump. Is the New York Times capable of a little shame in the form of straightforward truthtelling about Trump? We’ll soon find out.

As for Kamala Harris, I think we should wait and see what happens between now and the Democratic convention, which starts August 19. It’s not over until the convention makes the nomination official. It seems that some of the Democrats whose position matters most want to hold off on endorsing anyone and waiting for the convention — Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem Jeffreis, and Barack Obama. That seems wise.

The media, always eager to attack Democrats, will now go on and on about “disarray” and “chaos.” That’s nonsense. The party process is working exactly as it should. In fact it’s working better than it was before, because the Biden campaign and the DNC never really allowed any other options during primary season.

It’s Nancy Pelosi whom I will be watching most closely. She knows every congressional district in the country. She has her own polling information and respects the media about as much as I do. She has no agenda other than winning. If Democrats can win both the House and Senate in November, it’s a sure bet that they’ll win the White House as well.


Update: Jonathan Rauch, in the Atlantic, reminds us that one of the responsibilities of political parties is to select strong, qualified candidates and to stand in the way of weak, corrupt ones. The Democratic Party did this, whereas the Republican Party has been hijacked by Trump. Just think: When Trump is gone, what will the Republican Party have left? Pretty much nothing but shame, irrelevance, and a rage that will accomplish nothing. The Atlantic piece is “The Party Is Not Over: Nominations belong to parties, not to candidates.”

Fiona Hill returns to the U.K.



Source: Wikimedia Commons

The Guardian reports today that Fiona Hill is returning to the U.K. to work for the new Labour government. She will be one of three advisers who will oversee a strategic defense review. In the U.S., Hill first came to our attention when she testified during Trump’s impeachment trial, having worked in the Trump White House, where she was called “the Russia bitch.”

The Guardian writes:

“Notably Hill and the other members of the review team will report not just to John Healey, the defence secretary, but also to the prime minister, Keir Starmer, and the chancellor, Rachel Reeves.”

A few years ago, I reviewed Hill’s book, There Is Nothing for You Here.

Oh, how I envy the U.K. right now. Not only is their election now behind them, they have a Labour government after fourteen years of Tory abuse. And they have Fiona Hill to help figure out how to deal with the Russians.

I have a particular respect for Fiona Hill partly because we have a mutual friend at the Brookings Institution, where Hill worked after the Trump White House. My friend sent her a link to my review of her book, which she read. She sent a reply to my friend: “This is wonderful. Please thank him. I am so glad that the book resonated this way with him. I was unaware of the Paul Krugman quote, but I guess it makes sense. My Dad and his friends would sit around on weekends talking for hours about practical things like this as I listened in as a kid. At the end of every discussion someone would say—well that’s everything settled then, we just need a bit of progress ….”

The Paul Krugman quote that she is referring to is Krugman’s frequent statement that reality has a distinctly liberal bias.